Museum that focuses on loca history vs Park
Both ideas offer certain advantages, i can see why people who live in the city might end up chooing option B. However there are several reasons why option A would be my preference.
Fisrtly, i think a museum would be beneficial to our local residents, specially to young people who are currently attending to university. A museum is more than just a souce of information, it is a place where families can convey and spend a beautiful evening together. In contrast, we already have several park with play area so onother one is unlikely to improve our city much.
However, building a museum could turn out to be a very profitable investment as it would create jobs for residents and international students. In addition, a museum of local history would also attract the presence of tourists to the city, and as a result local businesses would increase their revenues in a great manner. So a museum that appeals to tourists is likely to benefit our city's ecomony much more.
Finally, a museum would provide good educational opportunities for students at early and elementary schools. Elementary schools could organize special visits to the museum during the school year as part of their educational curriculum. On the other hand a park would offer few educational benefits.
So as far as i am concerned option A is the better choice.
Thanks for sharing insightful post .– Admisure.com
ResponderEliminarGet a more update for government job exam.
Casino Hotel & RV Park - Mapyro
ResponderEliminarFind the 김제 출장샵 best Casino Hotel 동해 출장안마 & RV Park in Laughlin, NV. Search reviews, photos & 사천 출장마사지 prices. Mapyro of Laughlin has 안동 출장안마 1529 rooms and has 3716. View info Rating: 2.9 광주광역 출장안마 · 1,073 votes